Unlock Advanced Circuit Analysis in KiCad Using SPICE & IBIS Models

Introduction

KiCad, a robust open-source electronic design automation (EDA) suite, offers integrated circuit simulation capabilities directly within its Schematic Editor. This integration is powered by ngspice, an open-source SPICE (Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis) simulator. This powerful combination allows engineers to perform various analyses, including AC Sweep, DC Transfer, Operating Point, and Transient simulations, directly from their design environment, thereby streamlining the design and verification process significantly.

The ability to simulate circuits effectively is indispensable in modern electronics design. It enables engineers to predict circuit performance, identify potential issues such as signal integrity problems like overshoot and ringing, and optimize designs before committing to costly physical prototypes. This guide delves into the specifics of leveraging KiCad’s simulation features, focusing on the integration and application of both SPICE and IBIS (Input/Output Buffer Information Specification) models. SPICE models provide a detailed circuit representation for analog and mixed-signal designs, allowing for in-depth analysis of voltages and currents throughout a circuit. In contrast, IBIS models offer mathematical representations of an IC’s input/output buffer behavior, primarily used for signal integrity analysis to characterize how signals interact with transmission lines and other interconnect elements.

It is important to understand that KiCad functions primarily as a sophisticated graphical user interface (GUI) and netlist generator for ngspice, rather than being the simulator itself. This architectural design means that while KiCad provides a user-friendly environment for schematic capture and simulation setup, a deeper understanding of ngspice’s underlying commands and capabilities, as well as KiCad’s specific translation mechanisms, is often necessary for advanced or troubleshooting scenarios. For instance, certain advanced simulation features available in standalone ngspice or other SPICE tools might not be directly exposed or fully supported through KiCad’s integrated interface, necessitating alternative approaches or external tools.

Section 1: Understanding SPICE Models and Their Integration in KiCad

SPICE models are text-based descriptions of electronic components or sub-circuits, forming the backbone of circuit simulation. These models can range from fundamental device descriptions for passive components like resistors and capacitors, to complex behavioral models or subcircuits (.subckt) that represent active devices such as transistors, operational amplifiers, or even entire functional blocks of an integrated circuit. KiCad’s embedded ngspice engine is designed to recognize and process these models, enabling the simulation of detailed circuit behavior. A notable advantage is ngspice’s compatibility with various SPICE dialects, including those from LTspice, PSpice, and HSpice, which significantly broadens the range of available models for designers.

Step-by-Step: Adding a SPICE Model to a KiCad Symbol

The process of integrating SPICE models into KiCad symbols is a fundamental skill for circuit simulation. This involves either utilizing KiCad’s pre-defined simulation symbols or attaching external models provided by component manufacturers.

1. Using KiCad’s Built-in SPICE Symbols

KiCad includes a dedicated simulation_spice library containing symbols for common components like resistors, capacitors, and various voltage sources. For passive components (resistors, inductors, capacitors), ngspice inherently recognizes their standard reference designators (R, L, C) and values directly from the schematic. This means that for these basic elements, an explicit external model file is often not required; their values are automatically interpreted and used in the simulation. This implicit modeling simplifies the setup for basic circuits.

For voltage and current sources, it is crucial to use specific SPICE symbols (e.g., VDC, VPULSE, ISIN from the simulation_spice library) rather than generic KiCad power symbols. These specialized symbols are designed for simulation and allow direct configuration of DC, AC, or transient parameters through their properties.

2. Integrating External SPICE Models (.lib,.mod,.cir files) from Manufacturers

For active components such as transistors, operational amplifiers, or more complex integrated circuits, designers will almost always need to obtain SPICE models from the component manufacturer’s website. These models are typically provided as .lib, .mod, or .cir text files.

The workflow for integrating these external models involves several precise steps:

First, download the relevant .lib file (e.g., for a BC547 transistor) from the manufacturer’s support or design resources section.
A critical best practice for project portability and avoiding broken file links is to copy the downloaded .lib or .cir file directly into your KiCad project directory. This self-contained approach prevents issues that can arise when linking to files from distant or network folders, which might become inaccessible if the project is moved or shared.
Next, place the corresponding generic component symbol (e.g., a standard NPN transistor symbol like BC547 from KiCad’s default libraries) onto your schematic.
Edit the symbol’s properties by selecting it and pressing ‘E’ or right-clicking and choosing “Edit Properties.”
In the “Symbol Properties” dialog, locate and click the “Edit Spice Model” button.
Within the “Edit Spice Model” dialog, navigate to the “Model” tab for active devices. Here, select the option to “plug-in a library to fill” and browse to your project directory to select the previously copied .lib file. Ngspice will then identify and list the available models within that library (e.g., “BC547”).

3. Configuring Key SPICE Model Fields

KiCad utilizes specific symbol fields to establish the link between a schematic symbol and its associated SPICE model. These fields are managed within the “Edit Spice Model” dialog and are essential for the correct generation of the simulation netlist. Understanding these fields is paramount for successful simulation setup.

| Field Name | Usage | Example | | :— | :— | | Spice_Primitive | Specifies the fundamental SPICE element type for the component. | “R” (resistor), “C” (capacitor), “V” (voltage source), “X” (subcircuit call) | | SpiceMapping | Maps the symbol’s pins to the corresponding nodes in the Spice netlist, particularly for passive components. | “1 2” (for a two-terminal resistor) | | Spice_Lib_File | Specifies the filename of the external SPICE model library (.lib, .mod, .cir) containing the model for this component. | “ad8051.lib” | | Spice_Model | The specific name of the SPICE model or subcircuit to be used from the specified library file. | “AD8051” | | Spice_Netlist_Enabled | A flag (set to “Y”) indicating that the symbol should be included in the generated SPICE netlist. | “Y” | | Spice_Node_Sequence | Defines the sequence of nodes for sources (e.g., voltage sources) or, critically, for complex models where the symbol’s pin order might not match the model’s internal pin definition. | “1 2” (for a voltage source); “3 2 1” (for a BJT pin reordering) |

4. Ensuring Correct Pin Order for Subcircuits

A frequent source of simulation errors arises from a mismatch between the pin order of the KiCad symbol and the pin order expected by the SPICE model, especially for subcircuits (.subckt). The sequence of pins defined in the .subckt statement within the SPICE model file must precisely correspond to the order of pins on your KiCad symbol.

For instance, when attaching a model to a transistor symbol, within the “Edit Spice Model” dialog, it is often necessary to enable the “alternate node sequence” option and manually input the correct pin mapping (e.g., “3 2 1” for a BC547, where the model’s internal pin order might be base, collector, emitter, but the KiCad symbol’s graphical representation or default mapping is different). This step explicitly reconfigures ngspice’s understanding of how the symbol’s pins connect to the model’s internal nodes, ensuring that the simulation accurately reflects the intended circuit. For multi-unit components like quad operational amplifiers, the .subckt definition in the SPICE model file should ideally list pins in an order that aligns with common KiCad symbol arrangements to simplify mapping. Placing these .subckt definitions at the bottom of the original SPICE model file is a recommended practice for organization.

Simulating a Circuit with Only SPICE Models

Once all components have their SPICE models correctly assigned and the circuit schematic is complete, the next step is to configure and run the simulation.

1. Setting up Basic Simulation Commands in the Schematic

KiCad allows designers to embed SPICE simulation commands directly into the schematic as text objects. Any line of text placed on the schematic that begins with a period (.) will be included in the generated ngspice netlist. These commands dictate the type of analysis ngspice will perform.

Command	Purpose	Basic Syntax	Notes/KiCad Specifics
.op	Calculates the DC operating point of the circuit.	.op	Provides steady-state DC voltages and currents.
.dc	Sweeps a DC source over a specified range and calculates the DC transfer characteristics.	.dc V_source start_val end_val step_val	Useful for plotting I-V curves or gain characteristics.
.tran	Performs a transient analysis, simulating circuit behavior over a specified time duration.	.tran <step_size> <end_time> [start_time][max_step]	Essential for observing time-domain responses like waveforms and charging/discharging of capacitors.
.ac	Performs an AC sweep (frequency domain) analysis.	.ac <sweep_type> <points> <start_freq> <end_freq>	Used for analyzing frequency response, gain, and phase shifts.
.include	Directives to include external SPICE model library files.	.include “model.lib”	Automatically added by KiCad based on Spice_Lib_File settings for symbols.
.probe, .save	Commands to specify which voltages and currents to save for plotting.	.probe V(node_name) I(component_name)	KiCad’s simulator interface typically handles probing graphically after simulation, making explicit .probe commands less frequently needed in the schematic.

It is important to note a significant limitation within KiCad’s current ngspice interface: the .step command, commonly used in other SPICE simulators like LTspice for sweeping parameters (e.g., temperature, component values) across multiple simulation runs, is not directly supported. This means that for parametric analysis, alternative methods, such as exporting the netlist to an external simulator (discussed in Section 5) or employing behavioral models with dynamic expressions, must be considered.

2. Running the Simulation and Probing Results

After placing the necessary SPICE commands on the schematic, the simulation can be launched directly from the KiCad Schematic Editor. This typically involves clicking the “Simulate” icon in the toolbar or navigating through the menu options.

Upon execution, the simulation results will be displayed in a dedicated plotter window. Within this window, designers can use the probe tool to select specific nets to plot voltage waveforms or pins to plot current waveforms. The graphical interface allows for interactive analysis of the simulated circuit behavior.

Section 2: Understanding IBIS Models and Their Integration in KiCad

IBIS models serve a distinct and specialized purpose in circuit simulation compared to traditional SPICE models. Understanding their application and KiCad’s approach to integrating them is crucial for effective high-speed design.

What are IBIS Models and When to Use Them?

IBIS models are specifically engineered for signal integrity (SI) analysis. Their primary function is to characterize the electrical behavior of input/output (I/O) buffers within integrated circuits, encompassing aspects such as impedance, voltage levels, and timing characteristics. Crucially, IBIS models achieve this without revealing the proprietary internal transistor-level details of the IC. This “black box” approach allows chip manufacturers to provide accurate I/O behavior models without disclosing sensitive intellectual property.

These models are indispensable for analyzing physical phenomena that occur on interconnects, such as PCB traces, especially in high-speed digital designs. They help predict and mitigate issues like transmission line effects, reflections, overshoot, ringing, and crosstalk. For example, an IBIS model can be used to simulate how a digital signal propagates along a trace, revealing potential signal degradation before physical fabrication.

It is paramount to understand a fundamental distinction: IBIS models do not describe the internal functionality or circuit behavior of an IC. For instance, an IBIS model for a microcontroller would characterize its digital I/O pins but would not provide information about its internal CPU, memory, or peripheral logic. Attempting to use an IBIS model for functional simulation, such as analyzing the internal operation of an oscillator or an analog amplifier, would be inappropriate and yield incorrect results. For such functional analyses, traditional SPICE models are required. This difference is a common point of confusion for designers new to signal integrity simulation.

KiCad’s Approach to IBIS Models

KiCad’s internal ngspice simulator does not natively support IBIS models directly in their .ibs format. Instead, KiCad’s Eeschema handles IBIS support by acting as an intermediary: it processes the .ibs file data and converts it into SPICE behavioral subcircuits. These converted SPICE models are then supplied to ngspice for simulation.

This conversion process implies that any IBIS simulation performed within KiCad is, at its core, a SPICE simulation of a derived behavioral model. This indirect approach adds a layer of complexity to the workflow and introduces potential limitations, such as the accuracy of the conversion process or the specific features of the converter used. The integration of IBIS support within KiCad, particularly in versions like KiCad 8, has seen improvements, with Eeschema taking on more responsibility for this conversion. However, as this feature is still evolving, designers may find that some advanced IBIS analysis capabilities, such as comprehensive crosstalk simulation, are not yet fully supported or clearly defined within the KiCad environment.

Feature	SPICE Models	IBIS Models
Scope	Detailed analysis of each point in a circuit, including internal workings.	Simulates I/O buffers of an IC with a summative model of I/O buffer behavior.
Speed	Can be very slow, particularly in the time-domain for complex circuits.	Typically faster than SPICE simulations due to higher abstraction.
How Models are Created	Created from schematics (transistor-level or behavioral descriptions).	Coded directly from circuit models, representing measured or characterized I/O behavior.
Typical Applications	Analog and mixed-signal designs, functional verification, power supply analysis.	Signal integrity analysis (high-speed I/Os, transmission lines), overshoot/ringing, timing, eye diagrams, TDR.
Level of Detail	Transistor-level or behavioral circuit representation.	Mathematical representation of I/O buffer characteristics (impedance, voltage, timing).
Standardization	No single standardized format; variants like PSpice, LTspice have proprietary formats.	Prepared in a standardized format (Input/Output Buffer Information Specification).
KiCad Integration	Direct support via ngspice.	Indirect support via Eeschema converting IBIS to SPICE behavioral subcircuits.

Step-by-Step: Adding an IBIS Model to a KiCad Symbol

The process of adding an IBIS model to a KiCad symbol involves an intermediate conversion step due to ngspice’s native SPICE-only nature.

1. Obtaining IBIS Models

IBIS models are typically provided by component manufacturers and are available for download from their websites, usually in .ibs file format. These files contain the necessary data to characterize the I/O buffers.

2. Utilizing IBIS-to-SPICE Converters

Since ngspice requires a SPICE format, an external converter is essential. A free Java web-app, which can also be converted into a standalone offline JAR file, has been identified as a tool capable of converting IBIS models into ngspice-compatible behavioral subcircuits. This conversion step generates a .cir or .lib file that ngspice can interpret.

It is important to be aware that some converters might have limitations. For instance, some tools may only utilize linear ramp data (e.g., voltage-time (V-T) information) rather than full data points for rising and falling waveforms, which could potentially affect the accuracy of the converted model. Designers should verify the capabilities of their chosen converter.

3. Attaching the Converted Model to a KiCad Symbol

Once the .ibs file has been converted into a SPICE behavioral subcircuit (.cir or .lib file), the attachment process becomes similar to that of adding any other external SPICE model (as detailed in Section 1.2.2).

Place a generic symbol on your schematic that represents the I/O buffer or component you are modeling. KiCad’s Simulation_SPICE library may contain specific symbols designed for IBIS applications, such as IBIS_DRIVER or IBIS_RECEIVER.
Edit the symbol’s properties and access the “Edit Spice Model” dialog.
Link the symbol to your converted SPICE model file by specifying the Spice_Lib_File and ensuring the Spice_Model field correctly points to the subcircuit name generated by the converter.
A critical step, as with all SPICE subcircuits, is to ensure that the pin order of your KiCad symbol precisely matches the pin order defined within the converted SPICE subcircuit. Incorrect pin mapping is a common source of simulation errors.

Simulating a Circuit with Only IBIS Models

Simulating circuits primarily composed of IBIS models is focused on signal integrity analysis rather than functional behavior.

1. Setting up Transmission Lines and Appropriate Stimulus

IBIS simulations are inherently concerned with how signals behave on interconnects. Therefore, the schematic will typically include:

Transmission Line Models: Components like TLINE (from the Simulation_SPICE library) are used to represent PCB traces. These models require parameters such as characteristic impedance and propagation delay.
Appropriate Stimulus: A suitable signal source, such as a pulse voltage source, must be defined to drive the IBIS driver model. Interestingly, some simulation parameters for IBIS models, such as t(on), t(off), Delay, and number of cycles for the stimulus, might be configured directly within the properties of the driver symbol itself. This approach can be less intuitive compared to placing global simulation commands on the schematic, potentially requiring designers to open the driver symbol’s properties multiple times to adjust simulation settings.
Termination: For accurate signal integrity analysis, proper termination (e.g., 50Ω resistors) of transmission lines at their source and/or load is crucial to minimize reflections.

2. Interpreting IBIS Simulation Results

Running an IBIS simulation in KiCad is similar to running a SPICE simulation; the “simulation” button in the toolbar initiates the process. The results are then displayed in a plotter window. The interpretation of these results focuses on signal integrity metrics:

Overshoot and Ringing: Analyzing voltage excursions beyond the nominal high or low logic levels, and the oscillations that follow. These indicate signal integrity issues that can lead to false triggering or component stress.
Signal Propagation: Observing how signals travel along interconnects, including delays and distortion.
Eye Diagrams: For digital signals, eye diagrams provide a comprehensive visual representation of signal quality, illustrating noise margins, jitter, and rise/fall times.
TDR (Time Domain Reflectometry) Response: Used to characterize impedance discontinuities along a transmission line.
S-parameters: For frequency-domain analysis of signal transmission and reflection characteristics.

By comparing these simulation results against design specifications or industry standards, engineers can qualify channel designs and identify potential signal integrity issues before physical prototyping. The ability to perform such analyses with a free and open-source tool like KiCad, even with an intermediate conversion step, represents a significant advancement for the community.

Section 3: Mixed SPICE and IBIS Simulation Workflow

Modern electronic designs often feature a blend of analog, digital, and high-speed interfaces, necessitating the use of both SPICE and IBIS models within a single simulation environment. KiCad facilitates this by treating converted IBIS models as SPICE behavioral subcircuits, allowing them to coexist with traditional SPICE models on the same schematic.

Combining Different Model Types in a Single Schematic

Designers can integrate components modeled with SPICE (for their functional circuit behavior) alongside I/O buffers characterized by IBIS models (for their signal integrity performance) within the same KiCad schematic. For example, an analog front-end (e.g., an amplifier or filter) might be designed and simulated using detailed SPICE models, with its output then connected to the input pin of a high-speed digital IC whose I/O buffer is represented by an IBIS-derived SPICE model. This digital IC’s output, in turn, might drive a transmission line, with its signal integrity analyzed using its corresponding IBIS driver model.

This approach allows for a holistic simulation that encompasses both the functional correctness of analog or mixed-signal blocks and the high-speed signal behavior at the interfaces.

Practical Considerations for Mixed-Model Simulations

While combining SPICE and IBIS models is technically feasible in KiCad, several practical considerations are essential for successful results:

Purpose Clarity: It is vital to maintain a clear understanding of what each model type contributes to the overall simulation. SPICE models are used for detailed functional analysis of active and passive circuit elements, while IBIS-derived SPICE models are specifically for characterizing the high-speed I/O behavior of integrated circuits, not their internal logic. Misinterpreting a model’s purpose can lead to erroneous simulation results and wasted debugging time.
Model Availability and Compatibility: Ensure that all necessary SPICE models (for internal circuit blocks) and IBIS models (for I/O buffers) are obtained, converted to SPICE format where necessary, and correctly configured for ngspice. Verify that the converted IBIS models are compatible with the ngspice version integrated into KiCad.
Pin Order Consistency: For all complex models, whether they are traditional SPICE subcircuits or converted IBIS models, meticulous attention must be paid to the pin order mapping between the KiCad symbol and the model’s definition. An incorrect pin sequence is a very common cause of simulation failures.
Simulation Setup: The overall simulation commands (e.g., .tran for transient analysis) will govern the behavior of the entire netlist. The chosen simulation duration and step size must be appropriate for capturing both the potentially slower time constants of analog circuit blocks and the very fast rise/fall times characteristic of high-speed digital signals. This often requires careful selection of max_step parameters in transient analysis to ensure sufficient resolution for high-frequency events.

Workflow Best Practices for Complex Projects

Managing complex mixed-signal designs with various model types benefits significantly from structured workflow practices.

Hierarchical Sheets: KiCad’s hierarchical sheet feature is a powerful tool for managing complexity. It allows designers to break down a large schematic into smaller, more manageable sub-circuits, each on its own sheet. This modularity is particularly beneficial for mixed-signal designs, where different sections might employ different modeling approaches (e.g., an analog block with SPICE models, a digital interface with IBIS-derived models).

Individual sheets can be developed and even simulated in isolation by opening them directly outside the main project file. This approach simplifies debugging by allowing designers to verify smaller blocks before integrating them into the larger system.
While a direct feature to simulate only subsheets is an area of ongoing development for KiCad, the current workflow involves simulating the entire schematic and manually excluding specific parts from the simulation using their attributes.

Separate Libraries for Simulation vs. PCB Design: A highly recommended practice for larger projects is to maintain separate KiCad configurations or symbol libraries. One set of libraries would be optimized for PCB design, containing symbols linked to footprints. Another set would be dedicated to simulation, with symbols linked to SPICE or IBIS models but potentially lacking footprint assignments. This separation helps prevent conflicts and maintains clarity in the design process.
Modular Design and Testing: Developing and thoroughly testing complex sub-circuits or specific model implementations in dedicated, minimal test projects is a robust strategy. Once a block’s behavior is verified and stable in isolation, it can be confidently copied back into the main project schematic. This modular approach significantly simplifies the overall debugging process by localizing potential issues.

Section 4: Troubleshooting Common KiCad Simulation Issues

Despite careful setup, simulations can present unexpected results. A foundational principle in SPICE simulation is “Ngspice is always right”. This means that any discrepancies between expected and simulated behavior almost invariably stem from errors in the circuit design, model definition, or simulation setup, rather than a fault in the simulator itself. Adopting this mindset is the first step toward effective troubleshooting.

Diagnosing Numerical Instability and Floating Nodes

Numerical instability is a common challenge in circuit simulation, often manifesting as “time step is too small” errors or the simulation appearing to calculate endlessly without producing meaningful output.

Symptoms:

Error messages indicating very small time steps or convergence issues.
The simulation progress bar stalls, or output rows do not change.
Causes:

Unconnected (Floating) Nodes: Nodes in the circuit that lack a DC path to ground or a defined voltage reference can cause numerical instability.
Inconsistent Definitions: Issues such as multiple labels applied to a single node, or conflicting component parameters.
Problematic Source Configurations: Improperly defined voltage or current sources.
Extreme Component Values: Resistances approaching zero (short circuits) or infinity (open circuits) can lead to numerical difficulties.
Solutions:

Run Electrical Rules Checker (ERC): Frequently utilize KiCad’s built-in ERC. Pay close attention to warnings about unconnected pins, multiple labels on a single net, and “power” messages. For power nets, ensure PWR_FLAG symbols are correctly placed to indicate a defined power source.
Ensure DC Path to Ground: Verify that all circuit nodes have a DC path to ground, either directly or through a component.
Advanced Options for Switching Circuits: For circuits with significant switching activity, adding specific .options statements to your schematic as a text command can improve convergence. An example is .options method=gear chgtol=1e-11 reltol=0.01 rshunt=1G rseries=0.05 cshunt=1p trtol=1, which adjusts internal solver parameters for transient analysis.

Verifying Correct Model Pinouts and Addressing Missing Models

Incorrect model assignments or pin mappings are another frequent cause of simulation failure or unexpected results.

Symptoms:

The graph does not resemble the expected output, showing flat lines or arbitrary voltages.
Simulation errors explicitly mentioning missing models or subcircuits.
Causes:

Missing SPICE Model Files: The .lib or .cir file containing the model is not found by ngspice.
Incorrect Paths: The path specified for the model file is wrong, or the file is located in a distant folder not accessible by KiCad.
Wrong Model Selected: The Spice_Model field points to an incorrect model name within the library file.
Incorrect Pin Mapping: The most insidious cause: the logical pin order of the SPICE model (as defined in its .subckt or .model statement) does not match the physical pin order of the KiCad symbol. For example, an op-amp’s inverting and non-inverting inputs might be swapped in the simulation if the pin mapping is incorrect.
Solutions:

Local Model Files: Always copy all .lib or .cir files directly into your KiCad project directory. Avoid linking to external or network drives to prevent broken paths and ensure project portability.
One Model Per File: Where possible, prefer using individual model files for each component rather than large, bundled libraries. This simplifies management and reduces potential conflicts.
Verify Pin Order Meticulously: This is a critical step. For subcircuits, ensure the pin order specified in the SPICE model’s .subckt definition matches the pin order of your KiCad symbol. In the “Edit Spice Model” dialog, utilize the “alternate node sequence” option to manually correct pin mappings for components like transistors (e.g., “3 2 1” for collector, base, emitter if the model expects this order). For multi-unit components, ensure the .subckt definition aligns with the KiCad symbol’s internal unit pin arrangement.

Cautions with Vendor-Supplied Models and Their Limitations

While vendor-supplied SPICE models are convenient, they are not infallible. Designers must exercise caution and critical judgment when using them.

Potential Inaccuracies: Vendor models can sometimes be partially or completely incorrect, or they may only function reliably within a narrow range of operating conditions.
Hidden Complexities: Some models might contain hidden widely different time constants, discontinuities, or other numerical “bugaboos” that can cause the simulator to struggle or halt. They may even have built-in SPICE errors.
IBIS Model Misapplication: Remember that IBIS models are designed to characterize I/O buffer interfaces for signal integrity purposes, not to simulate the internal functional behavior of an IC. Attempting to use an IBIS model for functional simulation (e.g., an oscillator’s internal logic) will yield incorrect results.
Solution: If persistent problems arise with a vendor model, it is good practice to test it in a simple, isolated circuit. Do not place blind faith in simulation results; always maintain a qualitative understanding of the expected circuit behavior. If simulation results deviate significantly from expectations, investigate the vendor model as a potential source of the problem.

Effective Debugging Techniques

Troubleshooting simulation issues often requires a systematic and patient approach.

Take a Break: When encountering stubborn problems, stepping away from the design for a day can often provide a fresh perspective, allowing for the identification of obvious errors that were previously overlooked.
Utilize KiCad’s Backups: KiCad generates numerous backups. It is highly recommended to create named backups of your project at significant milestones, as debugging can sometimes introduce new issues that complicate the existing problem.
Isolate Sub-Circuits: A powerful debugging technique is to divide the circuit into smaller, logical blocks and exclude them from the simulation one by one using the “Exclude from simulation” attribute (right-click on a symbol -> Attributes -> Exclude from simulation). This method helps to pinpoint the specific section of the circuit or component that is causing the simulation to fail or behave unexpectedly. It is important to note that the “Exclude from simulation” function can sometimes lead to unexpected behavior itself, occasionally requiring a restart of the simulation window or even KiCad.
Separate Test Projects: For particularly complex sub-circuits or when working with new or problematic models, developing and testing them in a dedicated, minimal test project is highly effective. Once the block’s behavior is verified and stable in isolation, the working schematic block can be confidently copied back into the main project. This modular testing approach provides reassurance that individual components or sub-circuits are functioning as expected before being integrated into a larger system.

Section 5: Advanced Tips and External Simulation Options

While KiCad’s integrated ngspice simulator provides a robust foundation for circuit analysis, certain advanced simulation scenarios or specific feature requirements may necessitate alternative approaches or the use of external tools.

Implementing Dynamic Component Values for Parametric Analysis

A common desire in circuit design is to observe the circuit’s behavior as a parameter (e.g., resistance, temperature) varies. While KiCad’s ngspice interface currently lacks direct support for the .step command, which is widely used in other SPICE simulators for parametric sweeps , designers can achieve similar effects using behavioral models with dynamic expressions.

For instance, instead of assigning a static value to a resistor, its resistance can be defined by an expression that changes over time. An example is ‘200 + 40.18 * time’, where time is a built-in variable representing the simulation time in seconds. This allows for simulating scenarios such as a PT100 resistor whose resistance changes with temperature (if time is conceptually mapped to a temperature sweep) or a spinning potentiometer. It is crucial to ensure that such dynamic expressions do not cause component values to become zero or negative, as this can lead to numerical instability and simulation errors. Additionally, careful attention to units and prefixes (e.g., 1M represents 1e-3 in some SPICE contexts, whereas 1Meg represents 1e6) is necessary to avoid misinterpretations.

Beyond simple expressions, designers can create custom .subckt definitions for behavioral components, such as a switching resistor or a switch model, that turn on and off based on time or voltage thresholds. These custom models can be saved as .lib files within the project directory and then assigned to symbols, providing highly flexible and dynamic simulation capabilities.

Exporting Netlists for Simulation in External Tools

KiCad’s integrated ngspice is a powerful tool, but it is not intended to be a complete replacement for highly specialized or feature-rich external SPICE simulators. For advanced analysis types, specific proprietary models, or when a feature like the .step command is critical, KiCad provides the ability to export the schematic as a standard SPICE netlist. This positions KiCad as an excellent front-end for a broader simulation ecosystem.

The process for exporting a netlist is straightforward:

Navigate to File → Export → Netlist… in the Schematic Editor.
In the “Export Netlist” dialog, select the “Spice” tab.
Various options are available, such as “Use current sheet as root” (which exports only the current sheet as a subcircuit model) or “Save all voltages/currents” (which adds .save all or .probe alli commands to the netlist, instructing the simulator to save all node voltages or currents for plotting).
KiCad automatically adjusts passive component values to ensure compatibility with various SPICE simulators, for instance, replacing μ with u and M with Meg for unit prefixes, and rewriting RKM format values (e.g., 4u7 to 4.7u).
A particularly useful feature is the ability to configure KiCad to automatically run an external simulator after netlist generation. This is done by specifying the executable path of the external simulator in the dialog, using %I to represent the generated netlist file. This allows designers to seamlessly leverage the strengths of other simulators (e.g., LTspice for its .step command or extensive model libraries) while continuing to use KiCad for schematic capture and project management.

This capability underscores that while KiCad offers a convenient integrated simulation experience, it also provides a clear and effective pathway to access more specialized or advanced simulation features available in other tools, making it a versatile component in a comprehensive EDA workflow.

Conclusion

KiCad’s integration with ngspice provides a robust and accessible environment for circuit simulation, supporting both traditional SPICE models for functional circuit analysis and IBIS models (through an internal conversion to SPICE behavioral subcircuits) for critical signal integrity analysis. Successful simulation within KiCad fundamentally relies on accurate model integration, meticulous pin mapping between symbols and models, and a clear understanding of the distinct purposes and limitations of each model type.

For complex designs, particularly those involving mixed-signal components, effective project organization is paramount. Utilizing hierarchical sheets for modular design and employing systematic testing in isolated sub-projects significantly enhances the manageability and debuggability of the simulation process. Troubleshooting common issues, such as numerical instability or incorrect model behavior, requires a disciplined approach, leveraging KiCad’s Electrical Rules Checker (ERC) and employing isolation techniques to pinpoint problems. A healthy skepticism towards vendor-supplied models is also advisable, as their fidelity can sometimes be a source of unexpected simulation results.

While KiCad’s internal simulator offers a powerful integrated experience, it has specific limitations, such as the lack of direct support for the .step command for parametric sweeps. However, KiCad provides effective workarounds, including the use of behavioral models with dynamic expressions and, crucially, the ability to export netlists for simulation in more specialized external tools like LTspice. This dual capability positions KiCad not just as a standalone simulator but as a highly effective front-end within a broader simulation ecosystem.

KiCad is an open-source project that is continuously evolving, with ongoing enhancements to its simulation interface and capabilities. Staying updated with the latest KiCad versions (e.g., KiCad 8 and 9) is recommended, as newer releases frequently introduce improved features and address existing limitations. The collaborative nature of its development ensures that KiCad’s simulation capabilities will continue to grow, offering an increasingly powerful and user-friendly experience for electronics designers.

Works cited

1. SPICE Simulation – KiCad, https://www.kicad.org/discover/spice/ 2. Simulating a KiCad Circuit : 7 Steps – Instructables, https://www.instructables.com/Simulating-a-KiCad-Circuit/ 3. Simulation Workflow Best-Practise for a Complete Project …, https://forum.kicad.info/t/simulation-workflow-best-practise-for-a-complete-project/53856 4. SPICE or IBIS: Which Should You Use for High-Speed I/Os? – Cadence System Analysis, https://resources.system-analysis.cadence.com/blog/spice-or-ibis-which-should-you-use-for-high-speed-i-os 5. Automated PCB trace selection in signal integrity simulation for high-speed digital interfaces, https://antmicro.com/blog/2024/07/automated-pcb-trace-selection-for-si-simulation/ 6. Ibis model induce “Unable to read string” error – Simulation (Ngspice …, https://forum.kicad.info/t/ibis-model-induce-unable-to-read-string-error/46514 7. Ngspice is always right (KiCAD-ngspice transient analysis …, https://forum.kicad.info/t/ngspice-is-always-right-kicad-ngspice-transient-analysis-simulation-debugging/57509 8. Including Default SPICE Models in KiCad – Simulation (Ngspice), https://forum.kicad.info/t/including-default-spice-models-in-kicad/22908 9. Generating Outputs – | | | Documentation | KiCad, https://docs.kicad.org/7.0/en/eeschema/eeschema_generating_outputs.html 10. Schematic Editor – KiCad Docs, https://docs.kicad.org/master/en/eeschema/eeschema.pdf 11. SPICE .STEP Command – Simulation (Ngspice) – KiCad.info Forums, https://forum.kicad.info/t/spice-step-command/48140 12. How does one set or sweep temperature in a KiCAD SPICE simulation – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/KiCad/comments/1hrl4nz/how_does_one_set_or_sweep_temperature_in_a_kicad/ 13. IBIS models within ngspice/KiCad, https://forum.kicad.info/t/ibis-models-within-ngspice-kicad/17071 14. Free IBIS Simulator: KiCAD 8? – EE-Training, https://ee-training.dk/simulation/free-ibis-simulator-kicad-8.htm 15. “Simulating Your KiCad Circuits With Various SPICEs” – Stephan Kulov (KiCon 2019), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90Z6ffxzDz8 16. Using ngspice in KiCad: Documentation – Simulation (Ngspice …, https://forum.kicad.info/t/using-ngspice-in-kicad-documentation/59318 17. ngspice circuit simulator – stand-alone and embedded into KiCad, https://archive.fosdem.org/2024/events/attachments/fosdem-2024-2834-ngspice-circuit-simulator-stand-alone-and-embedded-into-kicad/slides/22676/ngspice-HolgerVogt_tEfhemB.pdf