Designing the best IBIS model

Abstract

This tutorial provides a comprehensive, step-by-step guide to creating accurate and robust IBIS models for digital components, from simple buffers to complex devices like DACs and FPGAs. It covers fundamental concepts, data extraction methodologies, file formatting, advanced modeling techniques, and essential validation practices, empowering engineers to ensure signal integrity in high-speed designs.

Part 1: Fundamentals and Simple Component IBIS Modeling

1.1 Introduction to IBIS Models

Input/Output Buffer Information Specification (IBIS) is a behavioral modeling standard that describes the analog characteristics of digital device I/O pins. It utilizes an ASCII text file format, containing tabulated voltage-current (V-I) and voltage-time (V-t) information, to represent I/O buffer behavior. This standard was initiated by Intel in the early 1990s to establish a common, standardized I/O model format for system-level signal integrity (SI) work, particularly as high-speed designs like the PCI bus emerged. The IBIS Open Forum, an industry organization, is responsible for the ongoing management and updates of the IBIS specifications and standards.

IBIS models are critical for modern digital design due to several key advantages:

• Signal Integrity (SI) Analysis: IBIS models are extensively used for board-level SI simulations. They enable system designers to anticipate and resolve potential signal integrity issues, such as crosstalk, overshoot/undershoot, and reflections caused by impedance mismatches, during the pre-simulation stage. This proactive approach significantly reduces the likelihood of board failures during physical testing.
• Intellectual Property (IP) Protection: A primary advantage of IBIS models over traditional SPICE models is their behavioral nature. They capture the external I/O behavior without disclosing proprietary internal transistor-level circuit design information. This is a crucial benefit for semiconductor vendors, allowing them to provide necessary simulation data without compromising their design secrets.
• Simulation Speed: By using lookup tables for V-I and V-t relationships instead of complex transistor-level calculations, IBIS models offer significantly faster simulation times. They can run up to 25 times quicker than structural SPICE models. This speed is indispensable for performing numerous iterations in complex board-level simulations, accelerating the design cycle.
• Tool Independence and Portability: IBIS is a standardized format, fostering the development of tool-independent I/O models. This ensures that a single IBIS model can be utilized across various IBIS-compliant simulators, promoting portability and interoperability among models from different semiconductor and EDA vendors.

The core concepts underpinning IBIS models revolve around their data representation:

• Behavioral Modeling: IBIS models abstract the complex internal circuitry of I/O buffers, focusing solely on their external electrical behavior. This abstraction is fundamental to achieving IP protection and accelerated simulation speeds.
• V-I (Voltage-Current) Data: These tables characterize the static (DC) current-voltage behavior of the buffer’s pull-up, pull-down, and electrostatic discharge (ESD) clamp components. Data is typically collected over an extended voltage range, often from –VDD to 2 × VDD, and across three critical corners: typical, minimum, and maximum. These corners account for variations in process, voltage, and temperature.
• V-t (Voltage-Time) Data: These tables describe the dynamic (AC) switching behavior of the I/O buffer, specifically its rising (low-to-high) and falling (high-to-low) waveforms. This data is typically measured with a specified load connected to the output, commonly 50 Ω, to represent realistic transmission line conditions.
• ASCII Format: All IBIS models are stored as human-readable, plain ASCII text files, which facilitates their creation, editing, and parsing by various software tools.

The IBIS Open Forum is the governing body for the IBIS specifications, regularly holding teleconferences and summits to propose updates and ratify standard changes. IBIS has undergone continuous evolution since its inception, with numerous versions released to address increasing design complexities:

• Version 1.0 (1993): The initial release, primarily for CMOS and TTL I/O buffers.
• Version 2.1 (1995): Added support for ECL and PECL buffers, and differential lines.
• Version 3.2 (1999): Introduced package model descriptions.
• Version 5.0 (2008): A significant update, adding the Algorithmic Model Interface (AMI), features for power integrity (PI), and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) checking.
• Version 7.0 (2019): Further enhanced interconnect modeling with Touchstone and IBIS-ISS (SPICE) support, and introduced “back-channel” link training protocol support for IBIS-AMI models.

Proposed changes to the standard are formally documented as Buffer Issue Resolution Documents (BIRDs). The continuous emphasis on IP protection and simulation speed as core advantages of IBIS inherently points to a balance with the detailed, transistor-level accuracy offered by SPICE models. The ongoing evolution of IBIS, particularly with the introduction of IBIS-AMI , power integrity modeling , and interconnect models like Touchstone and IBIS-ISS , demonstrates a deliberate strategy. The standard is adapting to incorporate more complex, high-frequency, and power-aware effects without sacrificing its behavioral nature or IP protection. This adaptation reflects the escalating complexity and operating frequencies of modern digital integrated circuits. As signal integrity challenges become more pronounced, there is a growing industry need for models that are both computationally efficient for system-level simulations and sufficiently accurate to capture critical high-speed phenomena. This evolution also implies a rising demand for more advanced data extraction and validation methodologies to keep pace with the standard’s capabilities.

1.2 Core Elements of an IBIS Model

An IBIS model is structurally organized into three primary sections: the main header file, the component description, and the buffer model.

The main header file provides general information about the IBIS file itself, including the IBIS version, file revision number, component name, manufacturer, and descriptive comments. The revision number can indicate the correlation status of the model, for instance, a “2.x” revision often signifies a file correlated to silicon measurements.

The component description section details the integrated circuit component for which the IBIS model is created. The [Component] keyword defines the IC. The [Pin] keyword is crucial, establishing the association between the component’s external physical pins and their corresponding I/O models and signal names. It also allows for the specification of pin-specific package parasitics (R_pin, L_pin, C_pin), which, if present, override any global package parasitic values defined under the [Package] keyword. For components with multiple power domains or complex I/O structures, the [Pin Mapping] keyword is essential. It allows a set of I/O cells (pins) to be explicitly associated with particular internal power and ground pins or buses. This enables the modeling of multiple pull-up/pull-down rail voltages and is critical for accurate power integrity and crosstalk analysis.

The buffer model section defines the electrical characteristics for each distinct I/O buffer type within the component using the [Model] keyword. Common buffer types include:

• Input Buffer: Primarily models the receiver behavior and is defined by its ESD structures (, [Power Clamp]) and intrinsic input capacitance ([C_comp]).
• Output Buffer (Two-State): Models the driver behavior when actively driving high or low. Its characteristics are defined by [Pullup], [Pulldown],, [Power Clamp],, and [C_comp].
• Three-State Output Buffer: Similar to a two-state output but includes a high-impedance state. Accurate modeling requires specific characterization of the clamp diodes when the buffer is in its TRI-STATE® mode.
• I/O (Bi-directional) Buffer: Combines the characteristics and requirements of both input and output buffers.
• Open-Drain Buffer: A specific output type characterized by its unique [Pulldown] characteristics and typically lacking a conventional [Pullup] structure, relying instead on an external pull-up resistor.

Several essential keywords and their associated data are fundamental to any IBIS model:

• [Package]: Defines the default lumped RLC (Resistance, Inductance, Capacitance) parasitics (R_pkg, L_pkg, C_pkg) that are globally applied to all component pins unless overridden by pin-specific values.
• [C_comp]: Represents the intrinsic input/output capacitance of the bare die, excluding any package parasitics.
• [Pullup]: A V-I table describing the behavior of the I/O buffer’s pull-up component when driving high. Crucially, this data is “VCC relative,” meaning the voltage values in the table are derived from Vtable = VCC – Voutput, reflecting the voltage drop across the pull-up transistor.
• [Pulldown]: A V-I table describing the behavior of the I/O buffer’s pull-down component when driving low, typically referenced to ground.
• : A V-I table representing the characteristics of the ESD protection or clamping diodes connected to the ground rail.
• [Power Clamp]: A V-I table representing the characteristics of the ESD protection or clamping diodes connected to the power rail, also often VCC-relative.
• : Defines the intrinsic dV/dt (rate of change of voltage over time) for the output buffer’s rising and falling transitions, specifically excluding the effects of package parasitics.
• ** /:** V-t tables providing detailed voltage-time characteristics for low-to-high and high-to-low output transitions, typically measured with a 50Ω load.
• ** /:** Specifies the nominal operating voltage and temperature conditions for which the buffer characteristics are valid.
• [VINH] / [VINL]: Input logic voltage thresholds (High and Low) that define the logic levels for input buffers.

Table 1: Key IBIS Keywords and Their Purpose

Keyword Name	Description	Typical Data Type/Format	Associated Buffer Types
[Package]	Defines default lumped RLC parasitics for the component package.	RLC values (scalar)	All
[Pin]	Associates physical pins with specific I/O models and allows pin-specific parasitics.	List of pin names, model names, RLC values	All
[Pin Mapping]	Maps I/O cells to specific internal power/ground rails or buses.	Bus names	All
[C_comp]	Intrinsic capacitance of the bare die I/O pad.	Capacitance value (scalar)	Input, Output, I/O, 3-State, Open-Drain
[Pullup]	V-I characteristics of the buffer’s pull-up component when driving high (VCC-relative).	V-I table	Output, I/O, 3-State
[Pulldown]	V-I characteristics of the buffer’s pull-down component when driving low (GND-relative).	V-I table	Output, I/O, 3-State, Open-Drain
“	V-I characteristics of ESD/clamping diodes to ground.	V-I table	Input, Output, I/O, 3-State, Open-Drain
[Power Clamp]	V-I characteristics of ESD/clamping diodes to power (VCC-relative).	V-I table	Input, Output, I/O, 3-State, Open-Drain
“	Intrinsic dV/dt (rise/fall rate) of the output buffer, excluding package effects.	dV/dt ratio (scalar)	Output, I/O, 3-State
“	V-t characteristics for low-to-high output transitions with specified load.	V-t table	Output, I/O, 3-State
“	V-t characteristics for high-to-low output transitions with specified load.	V-t table	Output, I/O, 3-State
“	Specifies the nominal operating voltage for the model.	Min, Typ, Max voltage values	All
“	Specifies the nominal operating temperature for the model.	Min, Typ, Max temperature values	All
[VINH]	High-level input voltage threshold.	Voltage value (scalar)	Input, I/O
[VINL]	Low-level input voltage threshold.	Voltage value (scalar)	Input, I/O

1.3 Step-by-Step: Creating an IBIS Model for a Simple Buffer (e.g., Inverter)

Creating an IBIS model for a simple component like an inverter follows a structured process, primarily focusing on accurate data acquisition and correct file formatting.

1.3.1 Data Gathering

The initial step involves a thorough review of the device datasheet. This document provides critical parameters such as the operating supply voltage, temperature range, IC package type, pin assignments, loading conditions used for timing specifications (e.g., RLoad, CLoad), and input logic voltage thresholds (VINL, VINH). These specifications form the basis for data extraction.

Data can be gathered using two primary methods:

• Simulation Method: This approach requires access to the device’s transistor-level SPICE netlist or design schematic. It is commonly employed by IC designers who have internal access to the design. Tools such as LTspice can be used to run simulations and extract the required data.
• Bench Measurement Method: This method necessitates physical units of the device and/or evaluation boards, along with the device datasheet. It is often preferred by system designers or those without access to proprietary internal IC design data. V-I data can be collected using equipment like a curve tracer or a programmable power supply with sinking and sourcing capabilities. Package parasitics can be measured using Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) techniques.

The core of data gathering involves extracting V-I and V-t characteristics:

• Extracting V-I Curves ([Pullup], [Pulldown],, [Power Clamp]):

• Purpose: These V-I curves define the buffer’s static current-voltage behavior across its full operating range and into over/undershoot conditions, including the characteristics of ESD protection structures.
• Procedure:

• Clamps (, [Power Clamp]): To extract clamp data, if the device supports it, put the I/O pin into a TRI-STATE® (high-impedance) condition. Then, sweep the voltage at the I/O pin from a negative voltage (e.g., -VDD or -0.5V) up to a positive voltage (e.g., 2xVDD or 7V) and measure the corresponding current at each voltage point. For devices without a TRI-STATE, the clamp characteristics are derived by subtracting the pull-up/pull-down currents from the total I/O current.
• Pull-up/Pull-down ([Pullup], [Pulldown]): Data for these keywords is collected when the buffer is actively driving. For [Pullup], the buffer drives a logic high, and for [Pulldown], it drives a logic low. The [Pullup] data specifically is “VCC relative”. This means the voltage values in the [Pullup] table are derived from Vtable = VCC – Voutput. This convention is critical because the pull-up structure’s behavior is dependent on the voltage difference between the output pin and its associated VCC rail, not just the voltage relative to ground. Correctly applying this voltage referencing is paramount for precise simulation of high-side driving characteristics and clamp diode activation.
• Corners: To capture process, voltage, and temperature variations, V-I data must be extracted for at least three corners: typical (nominal conditions), minimum (e.g., min voltage, weakest process, highest CMOS temperature), and maximum (e.g., max voltage, strongest process, lowest CMOS temperature).
• Extracting V-t Waveforms (,,):

• Purpose: These waveforms capture the dynamic switching speed and shape of the output buffer’s transitions.
• Procedure: Apply appropriate input stimuli (e.g., a fast-edge pulse voltage supply) to the buffer’s input and measure the resulting output voltage over time.
• Loading: V-t data must be measured with a defined load connected to the output. A common practice is to use a 50 Ω load, often referenced to both VDD and ground, to represent typical transmission line characteristic impedance. For standard push/pull CMOS, four types of V-t data are recommended: rising/falling waveforms with load referenced to VDD, and rising/falling waveforms with load referenced to ground.
• : The dV/dt (rise/fall rate) value, specified under the keyword, defines the intrinsic transition time of the output buffer. It is crucial that this value is extracted excluding the effects of package parasitics, as it represents only the die-level buffer characteristic.
• Determining [C_comp] and Basic Package Parasitics (R_pkg, L_pkg, C_pkg):

• [C_comp]: This represents the intrinsic input or output capacitance of the bare die, independent of the package. It can typically be extracted via AC analysis in a SPICE simulation environment.
• Package Parasitics (R_pkg, L_pkg, C_pkg): These are lumped RLC values representing the overall resistance, inductance, and capacitance of the package. They are applied globally to all pins by default. If not provided by the semiconductor vendor, these values can be measured using Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) techniques.

1.3.2 IBIS File Formatting

Once all necessary V-I, V-t, and parasitic data have been collected, the next step is to structure this information into an IBIS ASCII file, strictly adhering to the format defined in the IBIS standard. The file typically begins with the header section, followed by the component description (including pin assignments), and then the detailed buffer models for each I/O pin. This process can be performed using a standard text editor or specialized EDA tools designed for IBIS model creation, such as IBIS Development Studio.

1.3.3 Model Validation (Quality Level 0 & 1)

Validation is a critical step in ensuring the reliability of any IBIS model. For simple components, initial validation focuses on syntax and basic completeness.

• Using the Golden Parser (IBISCHK) for Syntax Validation:

• Purpose: The Golden Parser (IBISCHK) is an indispensable tool provided by the IBIS Open Forum. Its primary function is to rigorously check the syntax of the generated IBIS model file, ensuring that the data format adheres strictly to the IBIS specification.
• Procedure: Run the appropriate version of the IBISCHK parser (e.g., IBISCHK5 for IBIS 5.0 models) on the .ibs file.
• Requirement: To achieve Quality Level 0, the model must pass IBISCHK with zero errors. While warnings may sometimes be unavoidable, they should ideally be eliminated or thoroughly documented and explained. The parser’s error, warning, and note messages serve as valuable guides for model developers.
• Visual Inspection and Checklist Compliance (Quality Level 1):

• Purpose: Beyond mere syntax, Quality Level 1 involves a manual and visual review of the IBIS model’s text and generated waveforms. This step ensures the correctness and completeness of the model against a predefined checklist or internal guidelines.
• Procedure: Verify that the header information is accurate, that DC and transient waveforms comply with IBIS standards (e.g., V-I measurement voltage span of –VDD to +2 × VDD, current not exceeding 2A), and that ramp rates and typical/minimum/maximum values are consistent with the device’s datasheet specifications.

Table 2: IBIS Model Quality Levels

Quality Level	Description	Key Requirement/Validation Step
Level 0	Passes IBISCHK	Model passes the Golden Parser with zero errors.
Level 1	Complete and Correct as Defined in Checklist Documentation	Model passes Level 0, and all parameters (package parasitics, pin configuration, load, ramp rate, min/typ/max values) are correctly defined and consistent with device specifications. Manual/visual inspection.
Level 2a	Correlation with Simulation	IBIS model performance is correlated against the device’s transistor-level SPICE design under the same loading conditions.
Level 2b	Correlation with Actual Silicon Measurement	IBIS model performance is correlated against actual silicon measurements of the device under the same loading conditions.
Level 3	All of the above	Model passes Level 0, Level 1, Level 2a, and Level 2b, demonstrating comprehensive validation against both simulation and physical measurement.

This hierarchical framework for assessing model reliability and accuracy guides users through progressive levels of confidence in their models. It outlines the stages of validation, from basic syntax checks to rigorous correlation with real-world data, which is essential for any model considered “perfect.”

Part 2: Advanced Techniques for Medium Complex Components

Medium complexity components, such as microcontrollers with various peripheral interfaces or specialized communication ICs, often feature a diverse array of I/O types and require more nuanced IBIS modeling approaches.

2.1 Modeling Multiple I/O Types and Configurations

While simple components might feature only a single type of input or output buffer, medium complexity components often integrate a diverse mix of I/O types. Each buffer type has distinct IBIS keyword requirements and characterization procedures.

• Input Buffers: Primarily require accurate modeling of their ESD clamp structures (, [Power Clamp]) and the intrinsic die capacitance ([C_comp]).
• Output Buffers (Two-State): Demand comprehensive characterization of their driving capabilities through [Pullup] and [Pulldown] V-I curves, dynamic switching behavior via and V-t waveforms, and [C_comp], in addition to ESD clamps.
• Three-State Output Buffers: These buffers introduce a high-impedance state. Accurate modeling necessitates specific characterization of the clamp diodes when the buffer is placed in its TRI-STATE® condition, as this behavior is critical for signal integrity during bus contention or power-down scenarios.
• I/O (Bi-directional) Buffers: These combine the characteristics and modeling requirements of both input and output buffers, dynamically switching between driving and receiving modes.
• Open-Drain/Open-Collector Buffers: These are specialized output types typically characterized by their [Pulldown] characteristics and the absence of an active pull-up structure. They rely on external pull-up resistors on the PCB, which must be considered in the overall system simulation.

Many contemporary I/O buffers offer configurable slew rates, allowing designers to optimize signal integrity for various trace lengths and loading conditions, balancing speed with noise reduction. The keyword defines the dV/dt (rate of change of voltage over time) for both rising and falling transitions. For buffers with slew rate control, multiple [Model] sections within the IBIS file can be used, each representing a different drive strength or speed setting. Alternatively, more advanced IBIS versions (e.g., IBIS 3.2 and later) introduced the keyword to allow dynamic selection of different drive strengths or speed settings within a single model. Each selectable setting would require its own set of V-t curves and values.

Table 3: Common I/O Buffer Types and Required IBIS Data

Buffer Type	Essential Keywords	Key Notes/Considerations
Input	“, [Power Clamp], [C_comp], [VINH], [VINL]	Models receiver behavior and ESD protection.
2-State Output	[Pullup], [Pulldown], , `[Power Clamp]`, , [C_comp], ,	Models active driver behavior (high/low). [Pullup] and [Power Clamp] are VCC-relative.
3-State Output	All for 2-State Output	Requires specific characterization of clamp diodes when in TRI-STATE® (high-impedance) mode.
I/O (Bi-directional)	All for Input and 2-State Output	Combines characteristics of both input and output, dynamically switching modes.
Open-Drain	[Pulldown], , `[C_comp]`, , “	Lacks active [Pullup]; relies on external pull-up resistor. [Power Clamp] may be absent or different.

This table provides a clear and concise mapping of common buffer types to their essential IBIS keywords and data requirements, simplifying the model creation process for components that feature a mix of diverse I/O types.

2.2 Incorporating Multi-Voltage I/O Support

Modern integrated circuits, especially medium to complex components, frequently incorporate multiple power and ground domains or I/O banks operating at different voltage rails (e.g., 3.3V, 1.8V, 1.2V) to support various I/O standards or reduce power consumption. The [Pin Mapping] keyword in IBIS is crucial for accurately representing these complex power structures. It allows for the explicit association of specific I/O cells (pins) with their corresponding internal power and ground supply pins or internal buses. This capability is vital for precise power integrity analysis and for modeling crosstalk effects that can occur between different power domains. Within the [Pin Mapping] section, each pull-down, pull-up, ground clamp, and power clamp can be referenced to a unique, named rail or bus. This detailed mapping ensures that the buffer’s behavior is simulated with respect to its actual power supply connections.

As previously noted, the data for [Pullup] and [Power Clamp] keywords are designated as “VCC relative”. This means that the voltage values presented in their respective V-I tables are not referenced to ground, but rather derived from the equation Vtable = VCC – Voutput. This convention is fundamental for accurate simulation because the electrical behavior of the pull-up structure and the power clamp diode is inherently dependent on the voltage difference between the output pin and its specific VCC supply rail, rather than its potential relative to the global ground. Correctly applying this voltage referencing is paramount for precise simulation of high-side driving characteristics and clamp diode activation.

The necessity of the [Pin Mapping] keyword for handling multiple voltage rails represents a significant conceptual advancement beyond simple signal integrity. It directly links the behavior of individual I/O buffers to the dynamics of the power delivery network (PDN). If I/Os share a power rail, their simultaneous switching can cause voltage fluctuations on that rail, which in turn affects the performance of all other I/Os connected to it. This establishes a causal relationship: PDN noise, a power integrity concern, directly impacts signal timing and voltage levels, which are signal integrity concerns. This highlights a critical shift from isolated signal-centric SI analysis to a more holistic, co-analysis approach integrating signal and power integrity. For medium to complex components, neglecting the effects of multi-rail power delivery can lead to substantial inaccuracies in simulation results, particularly concerning simultaneous switching noise (SSN) and power-supply induced jitter (PSIJ), which are increasingly prevalent in high-speed designs.

2.3 Detailed Package Parasitics Modeling

Package parasitics—the inherent resistance, inductance, and capacitance of the IC package—are not merely minor effects; they significantly influence signal integrity, especially at higher operating frequencies. These parasitics introduce loading effects, reflections, and coupling, which can degrade signal quality and impact timing.

While the [Package] keyword provides a set of global, default lumped RLC parasitics that apply to all pins , a more accurate and detailed approach for medium complexity components involves specifying unique R_pin, L_pin, and C_pin values for each individual signal pin. These pin-specific values are defined under the [Pin] keyword and, if present, will override the global [Package] defaults.

For high-frequency, broadband devices, IBIS allows package effects such as traces, bond wires, and vias to be represented as distributed transmission lines using the Len parameter. If the Len parameter is non-zero, then the RLC values represent distributed elements per unit length, as in A1 Len=1.2 L=1.0n C=2.5p R=0.05. This is a more accurate representation than simple lumped elements, especially as frequencies increase. It is important to note that traditional IBIS package parasitics are often represented as a single-pole, lumped RLC model, which is primarily suitable for lower-frequency analyses and may have been measured at a single, fixed frequency. Some simulators can convert this lumped L and C information into a distributed transmission line to approximate package parasitics, but for truly accurate high-frequency analysis, using distributed models or S-parameter package models (often in external .pkg files) is preferred. The limitations of lumped models at high frequencies underscore the need for distributed models or S-parameters for accurate high-speed analysis. This progression in modeling capability is essential to capture the complex, frequency-dependent behavior of interconnects, which becomes increasingly significant as data rates climb. Without these more sophisticated package models, simulations may fail to predict critical signal integrity issues like reflections and crosstalk, leading to costly board redesigns.

Part 3: Designing a Perfect IBIS Model for Very Complex Components (DACs, FPGAs)

Very complex components like high-speed Digital-to-Analog Converters (DACs) and Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) present unique challenges for IBIS modeling due to their high data rates, advanced I/O capabilities, and intricate power delivery networks.

3.1 High-Speed I/O Challenges and IBIS-AMI for SerDes

High-speed I/O, particularly in SerDes (Serializer/Deserializer) interfaces found in DACs, FPGAs, and other high-performance ICs, operates at multi-gigabit speeds, introducing significant signal integrity challenges such as inter-symbol interference (ISI), crosstalk, and jitter. Traditional IBIS models, while effective for lower speeds, face limitations in accurately capturing the complex, non-linear, and adaptive behaviors of modern SerDes transceivers, which often employ advanced equalization and clock data recovery (CDR) algorithms.

To address these challenges, the IBIS Algorithmic Modeling Interface (IBIS-AMI) was developed and approved as part of the IBIS 5.0 Specification in 2008. IBIS-AMI models enable fast, accurate, and statistically significant simulation of multi-gigabit serial links. The fundamental assumption behind IBIS-AMI models is that SerDes channels can be broken into two parts for analysis:

• Analog: This part includes the electrical model of the physical interconnect, typically characterized using circuit simulation techniques and represented with traditional IBIS models.
• Algorithmic: This part includes the equalization digital signal processing (DSP) algorithms of the transmitter (TX) and receiver (RX), modeled through the Algorithmic Modeling Interface (AMI).

IBIS-AMI models consist of text files (.ibs and .ami) describing the analog channel, package models, and SerDes interface parameters, along with executable shared libraries (.dll on Windows, .so on Linux) describing the equalization algorithms. The .ami file describes the interface to control the features the model supports and provides user-settable controls.

AMI models contain three key functions called by the simulator:

• AMI_Init: A required function, responsible for initialization and processing of the linear time-invariant (LTI) impulse response. It is used for statistical simulations where an input impulse response is convolved with the device’s impulse response.
• AMI_GetWave: An optional function, used for non-linear time-varying (NLTV) waveform processing. This function accepts an input bit stream, modifies it based on the equalization features, and returns the modified bit stream to the EDA tool for time-domain simulations.
• AMI_Close: A required function for memory deallocation and cleanup.

End-to-end channel simulation with IBIS-AMI models can be performed in two modes:

• Statistical Analysis: Invoked using AMI_Init, this mode computes the eye diagram directly from step/pulse response, assuming static equalization. It is very fast and can compute very low probabilities of error (e.g., 1e-45).
• Time-Domain Simulation: Invoked using AMI_GetWave, this mode computes the SerDes response based on specific input patterns, allowing for adaptive (non-LTI) equalization algorithms. It is used for higher bit error rates (e.g., 1e-6 to 1e-8) and can model complex, non-linear behaviors. A model supporting both is called a “dual model”.

Key advantages of IBIS-AMI include:

• IP Protection: Models are shipped as compiled executables, preventing reverse-engineering of proprietary algorithms.
• Portability: The same IC model can run in different IBIS-AMI compliant simulators.
• Interoperability: Models from different semiconductor vendors can work together in a single simulation.
• Performance: Offers orders-of-magnitude improvement in simulation run time, especially for ultra-low BER contours.

The shift to algorithmic modeling for ultra-high speed interfaces is a direct consequence of the limitations of traditional IBIS at very high frequencies. As data rates push into multi-gigabit ranges, the complex adaptive equalization and clock recovery algorithms implemented in SerDes transceivers cannot be adequately described by static V-I and V-t tables. IBIS-AMI addresses this by allowing behavioral description of these algorithms through compiled code, enabling accurate simulation of dynamic, non-linear effects essential for modern high-speed links. This evolution is critical for designers to accurately predict and optimize link performance in highly demanding applications like PCIe, USB, Ethernet, and DDR.

3.2 Power-Aware IBIS Modeling (PDN Effects, SSN, PSIJ)

For complex digital components, particularly those with high switching activity, the interaction between the power delivery network (PDN) and signal integrity becomes paramount. The PDN, with its intrinsic resistance, capacitance, and inductance, can experience voltage fluctuations (noise) that directly impact signal quality.

• Impact of PDN on Signal Integrity:

• Voltage Noise and Jitter: Fluctuations on power rails can cause timing errors and jitter along the rising or falling edges of signals. This is particularly critical for high-speed I/Os with tight timing budgets.
• IR Drop: DC resistance in the PDN leads to voltage drops, affecting the nominal operating voltage of buffers.
• Gate Modulation Effect: The actual drive strength of I/O buffers can vary depending on the instantaneous value of the supply voltage, a phenomenon known as the “gate modulation effect”.
• Simultaneous Switching Noise (SSN) Modeling:

• SSN, also known as ground bounce or power bounce, occurs when multiple I/O buffers switch simultaneously, drawing large transient currents that cause voltage fluctuations on shared power/ground rails.
• IBIS 5.1 and later versions introduced keywords like **** and **** to account for SSN and the gate modulation effect. These tables provide effective saturation currents for the pull-down and pull-up stages, measured with respect to voltage variations on their reference supply nodes.
• The information in these tables allows simulators to calculate modulation coefficients that adjust the original pull-up and pull-down currents when the instantaneous power/ground node voltages deviate from nominal values. This provides a more accurate representation of the buffer’s dynamic behavior under real-world power rail noise.
• Power-Supply Induced Jitter (PSIJ) Modeling:

• Traditional IBIS models often do not correctly account for delay changes caused by supply voltage noise, leading to inaccuracies in PSIJ prediction.
• Newer algorithms and IBIS model modifications aim to improve PSIJ accuracy by introducing parameters like “driver DC-jitter sensitivity” and considering the time-averaged effect of power noise during propagation delay. These enhancements allow for more robust jitter estimation and waveform prediction under significant power supply noise.

The necessity of comprehensive power-signal co-analysis stems from the inherent coupling between signal return paths and power delivery networks. For complex ICs, the assumption of ideal power rails is no longer valid. Voltage fluctuations on the PDN directly translate into timing jitter and signal distortion. Therefore, a “perfect” IBIS model for complex components must go beyond isolated signal integrity analysis and integrate power awareness. This means modeling the dynamic current consumption of I/O buffers and its impact on the PDN, as well as how PDN noise feeds back to affect signal characteristics. This integrated approach is crucial for predicting and mitigating issues like SSN and PSIJ, ensuring overall system reliability and performance.

3.3 Modeling Complex I/O Standards in FPGAs

Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are inherently complex due to their large pin counts, configurable I/O standards, and user-programmability. Unlike ASICs, FPGA I/O behavior is not fixed but determined by the user’s design configuration.

• Configurable I/O Standards and Large Pin Counts:

• FPGAs support a wide variety of I/O standards (e.g., LVTTL, LVCMOS, SSTL, HSTL, differential standards). Each standard has distinct voltage levels, termination requirements, and timing characteristics.
• FPGAs often feature hundreds to thousands of pins, which can be configured to support different I/O standards and functionalities. This configurability, combined with the sheer number of pins, makes generic, static IBIS models insufficient.
• IBIS models for FPGAs must account for minimum, typical, and maximum process, voltage, and temperature conditions across these diverse I/O configurations.
• The concept of I/O banks, where pins share common power supplies and reference voltages, is critical in FPGAs. Proper I/O planning involves assigning I/O ports to specific banks and configuring their standards, which directly impacts the underlying IBIS model.
• Generating Custom IBIS Models for FPGAs:

• Due to their user-programmable nature, generic IBIS models provided by FPGA vendors typically only contain package data and a collection of all possible I/O standard models, without mapping them to specific pins.
• The recommended method for obtaining an accurate IBIS model for an FPGA design is to generate it directly from the Electronic Design Automation (EDA) tool used for FPGA development, such as Xilinx Vivado Design Suite.
• Vivado Flow Example:

1. Open an elaborated, synthesized, or implemented design within the Vivado IDE.
2. The tool uses the netlist and implementation details from the design, combined with available per-pin parasitic package information, to create a custom IBIS model specific to that design’s I/O configuration.
3. This process ensures that the generated IBIS file accurately reflects the I/O standards, drive strengths, and pin assignments chosen by the user for their specific design.
4. The output is a .ibs file that lists the pins used by the design, the internal signals connected to those pins, and the specific IBIS buffer models configured for the I/O blocks (IOBs) associated with those pins.
5. For designs without RTL, a generic IBIS model with package data can still be generated.

The dynamic nature of FPGA I/O modeling is a key differentiator. Unlike fixed-function ICs, an FPGA’s I/O behavior is not static but dynamically generated based on the user’s configuration. This necessitates a specific EDA tool flow (like Vivado’s write_ibis command) that can synthesize a custom IBIS model from the design’s netlist and I/O assignments. This approach is fundamental to ensuring that signal integrity simulations accurately reflect the actual behavior of the FPGA in a given system, accounting for its unique configurability and large pin count. Relying on generic models for complex FPGA designs would lead to significant inaccuracies and potentially critical signal integrity failures.

3.4 Hierarchical Modeling and Advanced Features

As ICs grow in complexity, particularly with integrated blocks like SerDes, DDR controllers, and sophisticated power management, IBIS modeling has evolved to support hierarchical structures and advanced features that capture these intricate behaviors.

• Hierarchical Modeling with and:

• For highly complex ICs, the IBIS specification allows for hierarchical modeling to manage complexity. The **** keyword, introduced in IBIS 3.2, enables the definition of multiple connection sections and forks for connections between the package pins and the semiconductor die. This allows for a more detailed representation of complex internal routing and power distribution within the package.
• The **** keyword allows for the inclusion of sub-circuits or alternative models within a main IBIS model. This is particularly useful for modeling complex internal blocks like On-Die Termination (ODT) or specialized analog components that might have their own distinct behavioral models. While useful for modularity, the use of “ can sometimes lead to portability issues with certain simulators.
• Statistical Process Variations (Typ/Min/Max Corners):

• A critical aspect of robust design for complex ICs is accounting for manufacturing process variations, voltage fluctuations, and temperature changes. IBIS models inherently support this by requiring data extraction for typical, minimum, and maximum corners for V-I and V-t characteristics.
• The “typical” corner represents nominal conditions, while “minimum” and “maximum” corners capture the weakest/strongest process, lowest/highest voltage, and highest/lowest temperature conditions. Simulating across these corners provides a worst-case and best-case analysis, ensuring the design’s robustness against manufacturing and environmental variations.
• On-Die Termination (ODT) for DDR:

• High-speed memory interfaces like DDR (Double Data Rate) frequently utilize On-Die Termination (ODT) to reduce reflections and improve signal integrity. ODT integrates termination resistors directly onto the memory die, offering configurable resistance values (e.g., 50Ω, 75Ω, 150Ω, or “off”) that can be dynamically adjusted by the memory controller.
• Modeling ODT in IBIS can be complex due to its configurable and dynamic nature. Approaches include defining separate I-V curves for ODT within “ sections, or modifying the [Pullup] and [Pulldown] curves to incorporate ODT characteristics, ensuring that the combined behavior remains monotonic. The configurability of ODT significantly increases the number of simulation combinations required for accurate analysis.

The evolution of IBIS from a simple static description to a dynamic representation is evident in these advanced features. Early IBIS models primarily described static I-V and V-t characteristics. However, the increasing complexity of ICs and the demands of high-speed interfaces necessitated the ability to model configurable parameters, dynamic behaviors (like ODT), and statistical variations. This progression allows IBIS models to capture more realistic device behavior under various operating conditions, moving beyond a single, fixed representation to a more comprehensive and adaptable model that reflects the intricate nature of modern digital components. This adaptability is crucial for achieving high confidence in signal integrity simulations for complex systems.

4.0 Comprehensive Model Validation and EDA Tools

Achieving a “perfect” IBIS model necessitates rigorous validation across multiple stages, moving beyond basic syntax checks to correlation with real-world data. This process is heavily supported by specialized Electronic Design Automation (EDA) tools.

4.1 Advanced Validation Methodologies (Quality Levels 2a, 2b, 3)

Beyond the foundational Quality Level 0 (Golden Parser check) and Quality Level 1 (visual inspection and checklist compliance), advanced validation involves correlating the IBIS model’s performance with more authoritative data sources:

• Quality Level 2a – Correlation with Simulation (SPICE):

• This stage compares the performance of the IBIS model to the device’s transistor-level SPICE design.
• Procedure: The IBIS model is simulated with a defined load (e.g., 50Ω) and its results are compared against a SPICE simulation of the same buffer under identical loading conditions. This comparison should ideally be performed by instantiating both models in the same simulation environment to minimize differences arising from simulator variations.
• Goal: To quantify the divergence between the IBIS model’s predictions and the SPICE model’s behavior, with SPICE results considered the “golden” reference for this stage.
• Quality Level 2b – Correlation with Actual Silicon Measurement:

• This stage compares the IBIS model’s performance against measurements taken from actual silicon units of the device.
• Procedure: The IBIS model is simulated with a load that mimics the actual measurement setup (including package and PCB parasitics, which are unavoidably present in bench measurements). The simulation results are then compared to the measured waveforms from the physical device.
• Goal: To ensure that the IBIS model’s predictions (typically the “slow/weak” and “fast/strong” corners) encapsulate all of the bench measurement data, meaning no measured data points should fall outside the IBIS model’s prediction window.
• Quality Level 3 – Correlation of Transistor-Level Simulation and IBIS Bench Measurement:

• This is the highest level of validation, requiring the IBIS model to pass both Quality Level 2a and 2b.
• Requirement: The model must demonstrate strong correlation with both the transistor-level design (SPICE) and actual silicon measurements, along with passing the Golden Parser test (Level 0) and satisfying the quality checklist (Level 1).

Best practices for correlation include:

• Using appropriate bandwidth for measurement setups to avoid missing overshoots/undershoots.
• Ensuring low inductance ground paths for probes and using high-impedance probes.
• Verifying that the board file is correctly set up for simulation.
• For IBIS-to-SPICE correlation, excluding package or PCB modeling in the simulation deck, as both entities are virtual.
• For IBIS-to-Bench correlation, necessarily including package and PCB models in the simulation, and using the simplest, electrically “cleanest” PCB available to minimize corruption of results.
• Reporting correlation results quantitatively, indicating the divergence from SPICE or the margin within the IBIS prediction window for bench data.

The imperative of multi-level validation for “perfect” models stems from the need to build confidence in the model’s predictive accuracy across different contexts. While SPICE correlation verifies the behavioral model’s fidelity to the underlying circuit design, silicon measurement correlation validates its accuracy against the physical reality of the device. A model that passes all these stages provides the highest assurance of its reliability for system-level signal integrity analysis, minimizing design risks and costly re-spins.

4.2 Key EDA Tools for IBIS Modeling

The creation, validation, and simulation of IBIS models are heavily reliant on a sophisticated ecosystem of Electronic Design Automation (EDA) tools. Major EDA vendors offer comprehensive suites that support various aspects of the IBIS workflow.

• Cadence Design Systems: Offers tools for signal integrity and power integrity analysis, often integrating IBIS models into their schematic and PCB layout environments. Their tools can be used for correlating IBIS models with SPICE simulations.
• Synopsys: A dominant vendor in EDA, providing tools that cover the full spectrum of IC design, including signal integrity analysis where IBIS models are utilized.
• Keysight Technologies (formerly Agilent Technologies): Provides tools like Advanced Design System (ADS) for high-speed digital design, signal integrity, and power integrity. Keysight also offers the SystemVue AMI Modeling Kit for AMI model builders and Channel Simulator in ADS Transient Convolution for model users. They provide video demos on step-by-step procedures to create SerDes behavioral representations and generate IBIS-AMI models.
• Siemens EDA (formerly Mentor Graphics): Offers HyperLynx, a widely used tool for signal integrity and power integrity analysis, which tightly integrates with PCB design environments like Altium Designer via connectors. HyperLynx supports IBIS models for comprehensive SI and PI analyses.
• MathWorks: With SerDes Toolbox and Signal Integrity Toolbox (incorporating features from acquired SiSoft QCD and QSI), MathWorks enables engineers to create and customize IBIS-AMI models for high-speed digital interconnects. Their tools support both statistical and time-domain simulations and facilitate the generation of .ibs and .ami files along with executable .dll/.so files.
• Sintecs: Develops IBIS Development Studio (IBISDS), a versatile software for viewing, editing, and verifying IBIS models in graphical or text modes. It incorporates the Golden Parser (IBIS version 5.0) for seamless model verification and offers features like model libraries, template creation, and easy editing of V-I curves. IBISDS also supports EBD and PKG files and facilitates error navigation for the Golden Parser.

The ecosystem of IBIS modeling is critical for creating, validating, and simulating IBIS models. These tools are not merely passive viewers but active enablers, providing sophisticated features for data extraction, automated file formatting, rigorous syntax checking with Golden Parsers, and advanced simulation capabilities for complex high-speed and power-aware designs. The continuous development of these EDA tools, often in collaboration with the IBIS Open Forum, ensures that they keep pace with the evolving IBIS standard, supporting new features like IBIS-AMI and advanced package modeling. This symbiotic relationship between the standard and the tools is fundamental to the practical application and ongoing advancement of IBIS modeling in modern electronic design.

5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

The journey to creating a perfect IBIS model for digital components, from simple buffers to highly complex devices like DACs and FPGAs, is a multi-faceted process that demands a deep understanding of I/O buffer behavior, adherence to the IBIS specification, and rigorous validation. IBIS models have become indispensable in high-speed digital design, offering a unique balance of simulation speed, intellectual property protection, and accuracy for signal integrity analysis.

The evolution of the IBIS standard, particularly with the introduction of IBIS-AMI for SerDes and enhanced features for power-aware modeling, reflects the increasing complexity and operating frequencies of modern integrated circuits. This progression signifies a shift from merely describing static I/O characteristics to capturing dynamic, configurable, and statistically varying behaviors, enabling more comprehensive and realistic system-level simulations.

To design a perfect IBIS model, the following recommendations are crucial:

1. Master the Fundamentals: A solid understanding of core IBIS concepts, including V-I and V-t data, package parasitics, and the different buffer types, forms the bedrock for any modeling effort. The “VCC-relative” nature of pull-up and power clamp data is a prime example of a fundamental detail that, if overlooked, can lead to significant simulation inaccuracies.
2. Prioritize Data Quality and Extraction: The accuracy of an IBIS model is directly proportional to the quality of its input data. Whether derived from SPICE simulations or bench measurements, ensure data is collected across the full operating range, including over/undershoot conditions, and for all specified process, voltage, and temperature corners (typical, minimum, maximum). For output buffers, always extract ramp rates independent of package parasitics.
3. Adhere to the IBIS Specification: Strict adherence to the ASCII file format and keyword usage is non-negotiable. The Golden Parser (IBISCHK) is an essential first line of defense; models must pass with zero errors.
4. Embrace Multi-Level Validation: A “perfect” model is a validated model. Progress through the quality levels, from basic syntax checks (Level 0) and visual inspection (Level 1) to correlation with transistor-level SPICE models (Level 2a) and, ideally, actual silicon measurements (Level 2b). Achieving Quality Level 3, which encompasses all these validations, provides the highest confidence in the model’s accuracy and predictive capability.
5. Adopt Advanced Modeling Techniques for Complex ICs:

• Multi-Voltage I/O: Utilize the [Pin Mapping] keyword to accurately associate I/O buffers with their specific power and ground rails, enabling precise power integrity analysis and crosstalk prediction in multi-voltage designs.
• Advanced Package Modeling: Move beyond simple lumped RLC models for high-speed components. Employ pin-specific RLC values or, for very high frequencies, distributed transmission line models (using the Len parameter) or S-parameter models to accurately capture frequency-dependent package effects.
• IBIS-AMI for SerDes: For multi-gigabit serial links, leverage IBIS-AMI models to capture the complex, adaptive equalization and clock recovery algorithms of SerDes transceivers. Understand the distinction between statistical and time-domain simulations and utilize dual models where appropriate.
• Power-Aware Modeling: Incorporate features like and tables to account for simultaneous switching noise (SSN) and the gate modulation effect. This integrated approach to signal and power integrity co-analysis is vital for predicting and mitigating power-supply induced jitter (PSIJ) in modern, high-power-density ICs.
• FPGA-Specific Generation: For FPGAs, always generate custom IBIS models using the vendor’s EDA tools (e.g., Vivado) that incorporate the design’s specific I/O configuration and per-pin package data. Generic models are insufficient for accurate simulation of user-programmable devices.

6. Leverage EDA Tools: Utilize specialized EDA software from leading vendors. These tools are critical enablers for data extraction, model creation, syntax validation, advanced simulation (including IBIS-AMI and power-aware analysis), and comprehensive correlation. Their advanced features are essential for managing the complexity of modern IBIS modeling.

By diligently following these steps and continually striving for higher levels of model fidelity and validation, engineers can create IBIS models that are not only compliant with the standard but also truly “perfect” in their ability to accurately predict and ensure signal integrity in the most demanding digital designs.

Works cited

1. Why IBIS Modeling Is Critical to the Success of Your Design – Analog Devices, https://www.analog.com/en/resources/analog-dialogue/articles/ibis-modeling-part-1-why-ibis-modeling-is-critical-to-the-success-of-your-design.html 2. An Introduction to IBIS (I/O Buffer Information Specification) Modeling – Texas Instruments, https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/snla046 3. TI IBIS File Creation,Validation,and Distribution Processes, https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/szza034 4. Input/output Buffer Information Specification – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Input/output_Buffer_Information_Specification 5. Simulating Altera Devices with IBIS Models – Intel, https://cdrdv2-public.intel.com/655132/an283.pdf 6. IBIS (I/O Buffer Information Specification), https://ibis.org/about/ 7. IBIS Open Forum, https://ibis.org/ 8. How to use the IBIS model for signal integrity analysis – NextPCB, https://www.nextpcb.com/blog/how-to-use-the-ibis-model-for-signal-integrity-analysis 9. Simulating High-Speed Serial Channels with IBIS-AMI Models, https://keysight.zinfi.net/concierge/OEMs/keysight/wwwcontent/resourceshowcaseen/applicationnotes/RotatingBanner/pdf/5990-9111.pdf 10. SPICE or IBIS: Which Should You Use for High-Speed I/Os? – Cadence System Analysis, https://resources.system-analysis.cadence.com/blog/spice-or-ibis-which-should-you-use-for-high-speed-i-os 11. About AMI – Keysight, https://helpfiles.keysight.com/csg/N1930xB/Analyzing/About_AMI.htm 12. IBIS MODELING COOKBOOK For IBIS Version 4.0 – IBIS Open Forum, https://ibis.org/cookbook/cookbook-v4.pdf 13. IBIS (I/O Buffer Information Specification) – IBIS Open Forum, https://ibis.org/home/about/ 14. The IBIS Open Forum Releases the IBIS Version 7.0 Specification with Enhanced Modeling for Serial Links and Electronic Package and IC Die Interconnections – SAE International, https://www.sae.org/news/press-room/2019/03/the-ibis-open-forum-releases-the-ibis-version-7.0-specification-with-enhanced-modeling-for-serial-links-and-electronic-package-and-ic-die-interconnections 15. IBIS-AMI – MATLAB & Simulink – MathWorks, https://www.mathworks.com/discovery/ibis-ami.html 16. Quality checks for power aware IBIS models, https://ibis.org/summits/nov16c/gupta.pdf 17. IBIS Model – IBIS Open Forum, https://ibis.org/training/3com-docs/IBIS_Syntax.doc 18. The IBIS model, Part 2: Determining the total quality of an IBIS model – Texas Instruments, https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/slyt400 19. IBIS Model, https://ibis.org/training/3com-docs/E0173.doc 20. How to Use the IBIS Model – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hassan-Nasser-9/post/How_to_build_the_waveform_with_IBIS_model_numerically/attachment/609e94916b953100014bd71d/AS%3A1023385215713282%401621005457521/download/ibis_howto.pdf 21. 50653 – SelectIO Design Assistant: IBIS Models & Simulation – Adaptive Support – AMD, https://adaptivesupport.amd.com/s/article/50653?language=en_US 22. Model package parasitics with IBIS – EDN, https://www.edn.com/model-package-parasitics-with-ibis/ 23. IBIS Modeling—Part 2: Why and How to Create Your Own IBIS …, https://www.analog.com/en/resources/analog-dialogue/articles/ibis-modeling-part-2-why-and-how-to-create-your-own-ibis-model.html 24. IBIS Models for Field Programmable Gate Array Devices | Altera – Intel, https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/programmable/support-resources/board-layout/ibs-ibis-index.html 25. IBIS Development Studio – Sintecs, https://sintecs.eu/eda/freeware-tools/ibisds/ 26. Freeware EDA Tools – Sintecs, https://sintecs.eu/eda/freeware-tools/ 27. How to Achieve a Quality Level 3 IBIS Model Through Bench Measurement, https://www.analog.com/en/resources/analog-dialogue/articles/ibis-modeling-part-3-how-to-achieve-a-quality-level-3-ibis-model-through-bench-measurement.html 28. What tools can I use to verify IBIS models? – Intel, https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/programmable/support/support-resources/knowledge-base/solutions/rd11232002_7985.html?__utma=267604958.412979822.1511308800.1511308800.1511308800.1&__utmb=267604958.1.10.1511308800&__utmc=267604958&__utmx=-&__utmz=267604958.1511308800.1.1.utmcsr=(direct)%7Cutmccn=(direct)%7Cutmcmd=(none)&__utmv=-&__utmk=162904383 29. IBIS Modeling (Part 3): How to Achieve a Quality Level 3 IBIS Model via Bench Measurement | Electronic Design, https://www.electronicdesign.com/technologies/test-measurement/article/21259661/analog-devices-ibis-modeling-part-3-how-to-achieve-a-quality-level-3-ibis-model-via-bench-measurement 30. IBIS Models | Analog Devices, https://www.analog.com/en/resources/simulation-models/ibis-models.html 31. What is SerDes (Serializer/Deserializer)? – Why it’s Important | Synopsys, https://www.synopsys.com/glossary/what-is-serdes.html 32. Understanding IBIS-AMI Simulations – MATLAB & Simulink – MathWorks, https://www.mathworks.com/help/serdes/ug/understanding-ibis-ami-simulations.html 33. DDR5 Controller Transmitter/Receiver IBIS-AMI Model – MATLAB & Simulink – MathWorks, https://www.mathworks.com/help/serdes/ug/ddr5-controller-transmitter-receiver-ibis-ami-model.html 34. IBIS Models for DDR2 Analysis, https://ibis.org/summits/dec05/katz.pdf 35. Pre-RTL On-Chip Power Delivery Modeling and Analysis – Computer Science, https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~skadron/Papers/Zhang_dissertation2015.pdf 36. PDN Simulation and Analysis Guide – Altium, https://files.resources.altium.com/sites/default/files/2022-02/PDN%20Simulation%20and%20Analysis%20Guide.pdf 37. IBIS Model Simulation Accuracy Improvement by Including Power-Supply-Induced Jitter Effect, https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10565615 38. IBIS Model Simulation Accuracy Improvement by Including Power-Supply-Induced Jitter Effect | Request PDF – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377173383_IBIS_Model_Simulation_Accuracy_Improvement_by_Including_Power-supply-induced_Jitter_Effect 39. US8656329B1 – System and method for implementing power integrity topology adapted for parametrically integrated environment – Google Patents, https://patents.google.com/patent/US8656329B1/en 40. Gate Modulation Effect (table format) – IBIS Open Forum, https://ibis.org/birds/bird98.3.txt 41. New Multiport I/O Model for Power-Aware Signal Integrity Analysis – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295243513_New_Multiport_IO_Model_for_Power-Aware_Signal_Integrity_Analysis 42. Understanding Power-Aware Simulation – Mentor Graphics – YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5c4B_tW5ac 43. Vivado Design Suite User Guide: I/O and Clock Planning, https://www.xilinx.com/support/documents/sw_manuals/xilinx2022_1/ug899-vivado-io-clock-planning.pdf 44. High-Speed Serial I/O Made Simple, https://www.xilinx.com/publications/archives/books/serialio.pdf 45. The World of Hardware Simulation – Adaptive Support – AMD, https://adaptivesupport.amd.com/s/article/936961?language=en_US 46. Placing I/O Ports into I/O Banks – 2021.1 English – UG899, https://docs.amd.com/r/2021.1-English/ug899-vivado-io-clock-planning/Placing-I/O-Ports-into-I/O-Banks 47. Generating IBIS Models‌ – 2025.1 English – UG899, https://docs.amd.com/r/en-US/ug899-vivado-io-clock-planning/Generating-IBIS-Models 48. Generating IBIS Models‌ – 2022.1 English – UG899, https://docs.amd.com/r/2022.1-English/ug899-vivado-io-clock-planning/Generating-IBIS-Models 49. “How to get IBIS-model” – YouTube, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XVANZalQo3k 50. Exporting IBIS Models – 2025.1 English – UG899, https://docs.amd.com/r/en-US/ug899-vivado-io-clock-planning/Exporting-IBIS-Models 51. Impedance Matching: Terminations – iCD, https://www.icd.com.au/webinars/12-07-25-Impedance_T-Lines+Termination-43slides+series%20termination%20example.pdf 52. 1, https://ibis.org/quality_wip/archive/20081203/davidbanasaltera/IQS%20Correlation%20Proposal/IQS_Correlation_Proposal_dbanas_2008-12-03.doc 53. Ibis validation – PCB Design – PCB Design & IC Packaging (Allegro X) – Cadence Community, https://community.cadence.com/cadence_technology_forums/pcb-design/f/pcb-design/4252/ibis-validation 54. Circuit Design and Simulation Software | Keysight, https://www.keysight.com/us/en/products/software/pathwave-design-software/eda-software-for-circuit-design.html 55. Comparison of EDA software – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_EDA_software 56. IBIS-AMI Generation, https://harrisburg.psu.edu/files/pdf/1003/2017/02/20/ibis_ami_model_generation_pam4_applications_psu_2015.pdf 57. IBIS AMI Model Generation Made Easy | Keysight, https://www.keysight.com/us/en/lib/resources/demos/ibis-ami-model-generation-made-easy-2189086.html 58. IBIS AMI Model Generation Made Easy – Keysight, https://www.keysight.com/ca/en/lib/resources/demos/ibis-ami-model-generation-made-easy-2189086.html 59. Infineon Accelerates Development of IBIS-AMI Models for SerDes Designs – MathWorks, https://ch.mathworks.com/company/user_stories/infineon-accelerates-development-of-ibis-ami-models-for-serdes-designs.html